Assessing respiratory exposure to harmful evaporations in a manufacturing company

Authors

  • Tayyebeh Jaddi Madarsara B.Sc. of Industrial Engineering, Industrial Safety Tendency, Kar University of Qazvin, Qazvin, Iran. Author
  • Navid Ahmadian Kudakan Student B.Sc. of Industrial Engineering, Industrial Safety Tendency, Kar University of Qazvin, Qazvin, Iran. Author
  • Saeed Yari 4- School of Health Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Author
  • Hamzeh Saeidabadi MSc of Environmental Management (HSE), Islamic Azad University of Tehran, West Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31557/apjec.2019.2.1.55-58

Keywords:

Respiratory exposure assessment, Occupational Asthma, Hypochlorite Sodium, Bleach, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, CANCER.

Abstract

Introduction: Using Hypochlorite Sodium in producing bleaches in order to disinfect and shine surfaces has been an ordinary method since 200 years ago. 10-15% solutions with PH=13 have been used for industrial purposes and 5% solutions with PH=11 have been used for domestic use. AIHA (American Industrial Hygienists Association) has announced the maximum standard exposure to this substance equal to 2mg/m3 in a period of 15 minutes. It should be noted that, based on material safety data sheet and NFPA rating explanation guide, the mentioned substance is mildly unstable (code 1), carries oxidation hazard (ox), and serious respiratory hazard (code 3).

 

Methods: This survey has been conducted with statistical society of 39, average age of 29.82±3.66 and work experience of 2.46±6.02 who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium in 2019. The reference of analyzing the data include medical check-up inventory, spirometry FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC relativity, using SPSS ver16, and T-test.

 

Results: The statistical society (39 participants) had a normal distribution, with a very pleasant correlation amounts in (FEV1/FVC, FVC, FEV1) considering sig=0.13, andless possibility than (P≤0.05). therefore, the amounts before and after FEV1, and FEV1/FVC, had a meaningful difference statistically, however, taking the amount of sig=0.68 into account which was P≤0.05, no meaningful difference was observed for FVC amounts before and after respiratory exposure to Hypochlorite Sodium.

 

Conclusion: Considering the reduction in amount of FEV1, and FEV1/FVC among the workers of the manufacturing site who were exposed to Hypochlorite Sodium, they are likely to have pulmonary obstruction, and therefore they are required to be changed in position and location of their jobs, and also appropriate ventilation system must be installed in the location of Hypochlorite Sodium evaporations. Keeping in mind the instability and corrosiveness of Hypochlorite Sodium, all employees had better use respiratory masks (preferably FFP3 in case of dusty materials), proper face shields, anti-acid gloves, anti-acid overalls, and chemical resistant boots.

 

Keywords: Respiratory exposure assessment, Occupational Asthma, Hypochlorite Sodium, Bleach, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, CANCER.

References

Racioppi F, Daskaleros P, Besbelli N, Borges A, Deraemaeker C, Magalini S, et al. Household bleaches based on sodium hypochlorite: review of acute toxicology and poison control center experience. Food and chemical toxicology. 1994;32(9):845-61.

Omidi S, Noorinezhad M, Mirbakhsh M, Marzbani A, Mohammad Nejad J. An Investigation on the possibility of utilization of chemical material for mitigation of Cochlodinium sp. bloom and their impact on the Litopenaeus vannamei shrimp. 2016.

Quirce S, Barranco P. Cleaning agents and asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(7):542-50.

Association AWW. Water chlorination/chloramination practices and principles: Amer Water Works Assn; 2006.

Estrela C, Estrela CR, Barbin EL, Spanó JCE, Marchesan MA, Pécora JD. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite. Brazilian dental journal. 2002;13(2):113-7.

Estrela C, Figueiredo JAPd. Endodontia: princípios biológicos e mecânicos. Endodontia: princípios biológicos e mecânicos1999.

Escudero-Oñate C. Survey of sodium and calcium hypochlorite. Skin. 2014;7681:52-9.

Exh G, Exh A. Return of Private Foundation. SAGE. 2005;10:38.

ACGIH D. HAZARD SUMMARY. 1996.

Wolf D, Morgan K, Gross E, Barrow C, Moss O, James R, et al. Two-year inhalation exposure of female and male B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats to chlorine gas induces lesions confined to the nose. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. 1995;24(1):111-31.

Tarlo SM, Lemiere C. Occupational asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(7):640-9.

Siracusa A, De Blay F, Folletti I, Moscato G, Olivieri M, Quirce S, et al. Asthma and exposure to cleaning products–a E uropean A cademy of A llergy and C linical I mmunology task force consensus statement. Allergy. 2013;68(12):1532-45.

Heederik D. Cleaning agents and disinfectants: moving from recognition to action and prevention. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. 2014;44(4):472-4.

Wanger J, Irvin CG. Office spirometry: equipment selection and training of staff in the private practice setting. Journal of Asthma. 1997;34(2):93-104.

Subbarao P, Lebecque P, Corey M, Coates AL. Comparison of spirometric reference values. Pediatric pulmonology. 2004;37(6):515-22.

Tsiligianni I, Kocks J, Tzanakis N, Siafakas N, van der Molen T. Factors that influence disease-specific quality of life or health status in patients with COPD: a review and meta-analysis of Pearson correlations. Prim Care Respir J. 2011;20(3).

Karkhanis VS, Joshi J. Spirometry in chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). J Assoc Physicians India. 2012;2(60):22-6.

Hyatt RE, Scanlon PD, Nakamura M. Interpretation of pulmonary function tests: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

Saeidabadi H, Nikpey A. Respiratory exposure with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene particle in appliance company workers. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2018;21(1):31-41.

No A. Guide to implementing an effective respiratory protective device programme.

Zock J-P, Kogevinas M, Sunyer J, Almar E, Muniozguren N, Payo F, et al. Asthma risk, cleaning activities and use of specific cleaning products among Spanish indoor cleaners. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2001;27(1):76-81.

Arif AA, Hughes PC, Delclos GL. Occupational exposures among domestic and industrial professional cleaners. Occupational medicine. 2008;58(7):458-63.

Matulonga B, Rava M, Siroux V, Bernard A, Dumas O, Pin I, et al. Women using bleach for home cleaning are at increased risk of non-allergic asthma. Respiratory medicine. 2016;117:264-71.

Health UDo, Services H. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry-ATSDR. 1999.

Cancer IAfRo. Chlorinated drinking-water; chlorination by-products; some other halogenated compounds; cobalt and cobalt compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Humans. 1991;52.

Program NT. NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Chlorinated Water (CAS Nos. 7782-50-5 and 7681-52-9) and Chloraminated Water (CAS No. 10599-90-3)(Deionized and Charcoal-Filtered) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Drinking Water Studies). National Toxicology Program technical report series. 1992;392:1.

Yari S, Fallah AA, Varmazyar S. Assessment of semi-quantitative health risks of exposure to harmful chemical agents in the context of carcinogenesis in the latex glove manufacturing industry. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2015;17(205):11.

Yari S, Asadi AF, Nourmohammadi M. Occupational and Environmental Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Cancer. 2018;1(1).

Yari S, Asadi AF, Jarrahi AM, Nourmohammadi M. CARcinogen EXposure: CAREX. Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Cancer. 2018;1(1).

Published

2019-06-09

Issue

Section

Original Research